.

Radiation From Nuke Plant May Have Escaped Outside, Officials Now Say

"Very, very low level' of radioactive gas could have been released into atmosphere, NRC officials say.

Officials with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission now say that some radioactive gas may have escaped the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, but it was undetectable by monitors and therefore posed no threat to anyone.

A unit at the station was shut down Tuesday when sensors detected a leak in one of the unit's steam generator tubes.

NRC spokesman Victor Dricks said because the equipment-housing building into which the gas leaked is not airtight, it is possible a "very, very low level'' of radioactivity escaped into the environment. Dricks said those traces would be
"barely measurable against [existing] background levels'' and would pose no
danger to the public.

Related: Plant Shutdown Costing $1 Million a Day

Technicians were still cooling down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 3 today after what a plant official called an "extremely small leak" was detected in the steam generator system Tuesday.

Plant spokesman Gil Alexander said it was impossible to say how long the assessment and repairs would take to bring Unit 3 back up to par because the damage has not yet been able to be assessed.

Alexander and a Nuclear Regulatory Commission official confirmed that the leak is isolated and the cool-down of the unit is proceeding without a hitch.

"I was in the control room the whole time," said Greg Warnick, senior resident NRC inspector for San Onofre. "They followed their procedures as required. They isolated the suspected leak... They closed all the valves that go into [the compromised water system] and out of it to bottle it up."

The leak, detected at about 3 p.m. Tuesday, comes from the primary system containing water that actually touches the nuclear fuel, making the water itself radioactive. When the plant is functioning properly, the water in this system remains sealed; it boils clean water through a series of heat-exchanging tubes to make steam, which turns a massive turbine to make electricity.

Now, Warnick said, some of the mildly radioactive water from the primary system has leaked into the secondary.

The steam generator system in this unit is only a little more than a year old—it was replaced

Warnick said this kind of leak is not common in nuclear power plants.

"It's not common," he said. "In fact, that's one of the reasons they replaced the system; the new one is made of more durable materials."

Warnick said the diagnosis of the problem was still several days away.

"It's hard to comment on that because there is still discovery to take place," Warnick said. "However, it is a thing the plant is designed for. Most of the operators [in the control room Tuesday] coincidentally had gone through training in the simulator the night before on this exact same scenario."

Related:

Meanwhile, Warnick said Wednesday morning that the leaking system had been cooled to about 320 degrees and the pressure was down to about 450 pounds-per-square-inch from its operating pressure of about 2,500 psi.

Once the plant is cool enough, inspectors will start their work.

"Based on that, there won't be any developments for several days," Warnick said.

San Clemente Councilwoman Lori Donchak Wednesday urged residents to remain calm. Donchak and the rest of the council spent a lot of time last year researching the plant and responding to resident concerns over safety after the earthquake, tsunami and subsequent nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan.

"We have a very strong emergency preparedness community program in place and it worked yesterday as planned," Donchak said. "The interruption at SONGS was handled efficiently and constantly."

She also mentioned that a blue ribbon commission about on-site nuclear waste storage at plants had completed its findings last week, a commission President Obama started in 2010.

Donchak said the report is on the agenda as an educational item at the Feb. 7 Council Meeting. The full text of the report is attached to this article in PDF form.

george gregory February 04, 2012 at 02:19 AM
they are just warming the sirens up before they make us all homeless
William E. Kessler February 04, 2012 at 03:00 PM
As a past nuclear power professional, I am somewhat displeased at our current means of storing nuclear waste at the individual plant sites. However, if our U.S. Govt. would apply the same means of storage used by as our Nuclear Navy in Idaho, the storage problem itself, would be simple. On the other hand, if we wish to use the nuclear waste in the future as fuel for breeder reactors, we should use the Yucca Mountain facility in Nevada in which we have already invested Billions of dollars. It seems that we are somehow "cowed" by the process by which we ship the spent fuel to Yucca. I can assure anyone that there are absolutely safe means available by which to ship this spent fuel to Yucca Mountain. These means have been tested to absolute extremes to assure their adequacy.
george gregory February 04, 2012 at 10:21 PM
radiation may be released by burning coal but the potential release from a nuclear plant is hugh
Chelsea m February 10, 2012 at 02:03 PM
I agree with William, and as a current nuclear facility worker I will second the displeasure of how we currently store our used fuel. The US is currently working on building a reprocessing (recycling) facility so that we can use our fuel to its full capacity and not have to store still energy rich fuel on site. This will be a wonderful development. We will not have to store as many assemblies in our fuel pool and will be using our fuel to its full potential. If a repository such as yucca mountain is to be used, the structure will be designed impeccably.
Gary Ault February 10, 2012 at 06:35 PM
Tjhe US had a pilot-scale reprocessing plant for commercial nuclear fuel, operated by Nuclear fuel Services, at West Valley, New York until ???. GE built the Midwest Fuel Recovery Plant at Morris, Illinois in the 70s. It used their proprietary Aquafluor process, but the facility was abandoned during preoperational testing. For years, they stored spent fuel from various commercial nuclear plants until it was all shipped back to its point of origin so GE could terminate the license. There was also a commercial-scale facility being, I think constructed, at or near the Savannah River site by Allied-Gulf Nuclear Services (AGNS), but it was abandoned after our beloved President Jimmah Carter caused reprocessing to be banned over (I believe over-wrought) proliferation concerns. AGNS would have used the Purex solvent extraction recovery process which had been proven at Hanford. We could have been recycling nuclear fuel for years, except for a complete absence of leadership, which characterizes our national government in all areas of endeavor except lining their own pockets.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »