.

Fish Off O.C. Coast May Have Ingested Radioactive Kelp After Fukushima, Study Finds

"It's not a good thing," says researcher after discovery that a radioactive isotope of iodine was absorbed by kelp off Laguna Beach and Corona del Mar a month after the disaster in Japan.

Fish along the Orange County coast may have been affected by radioactivity that fell on California in the days after Japan's 2011 nuclear disaster, as small levels of radioactive isotopes accumulated in local seaweed, researchers have reported.

The study poses the possibility that small amounts of Fukushima radioactivity has entered the California coast's food web, but the Long Beach State marine sciences professor who co-wrote a new study said he does not know if there is a measurable detrimental effect.

The radioactive forms of cesium and iodine "get dispersed over a variety of organisms" including fish, said marine biology professor Steven L. Manley. "I would assume it's there" in the biomass of plants and animals off California's coast.

"It's not a good thing, but whether it actually has a measurable detrimental effect is beyond my expertise," he said in a news statement issued by the Long Beach State public affairs office.

Writing in the scientific journal "Environmental Science & Technology," Manley and co-author Christopher G. Lowe said researchers measured a radioactive isotope of iodine in kelp within a month after massive radiation leaks were caused by the Japanese earthquake and tsunami.

Acting on a hunch, Manley began monitoring the kelp samples brought in for a different project last year by graduate student Danielle Burnett from Corona del Mar, Laguna Beach and Crystal Cove. Long Beach State's old radiation counter was not capable of identifying which particular isotopes were giving off electrons, Manley said.

"You have to look for the decay profile," Manley said. "I'd count them every few days and then you'd see a decay.

Kelp accumulate iodine 131, a radioactive form of iodine that has a very short half life -- less than 10 days. A half life is the time period in which half of a sample of a radioactive element loses its radioactive electrons, which can present a danger to human and animal health.

"I thought, 'I've picked up something. I wonder what it is?' " he said. "We let it decay away and calculated the half life, and it was eight days," he said, "and it was iodine 131."

The level of radioactivity in the Southern California seaweed was "probably not harmful because it was relatively low levels," said Manley. But "it may have affected certain fish that graze on the (seaweed) tissue, because fish have a thyroid system that utilizes iodine."

Cesium 137 has a half life of 30 years, as opposed to iodine 131's half life of below 10 days, so it may be present in California kelp to this day, said Manley.

"We were limited in what our instrumentation allows us to do," he said. "The big question was, 'is another major isotope that came over in the cloud, cesium 137, present in the kelp, too?' "

Manley and Lowe theorize that the radioactive elements blew across the Pacific in winter storm fronts that lashed the California coast shortly after the Fukushima Daiichi reactors blew apart, in the weeks following the massive March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami.

One particular strain of seaweed, Macrocystis pyrifera, is present in large canopies along shallow areas of the California coast. Radioactive rainfall was absorbed by the seaweed before the seawater had a chance to dilute it, the scientists said in their article.

Followup work showed varying amounts of low levels of radioactive cesium in seaweed from samples near UC Santa Barbara and UC Santa Cruz, the scientists said. No radioactivity was found in seaweed from Alaska.

Manley noted that future research into cesium accumulation in kelp is needed, but the graduate programs that support such efforts are in jeopardy due to state budget cutbacks.

Michael Short April 07, 2012 at 10:38 PM
"may have affected" MAY ?????
Alberto Barrera April 08, 2012 at 02:27 AM
Yes "may", radiation is everywhere. Just look at Chernobyl, the radioactive areas are not wastelands.
tuck April 08, 2012 at 03:29 PM
Wait until the "trash and waste" reach our area! it's floating in the Pacific heading for the West Coast."that's a fact jack"..........
george gregory April 08, 2012 at 07:39 PM
trust us they said ,,this wont hurt a bit they said ,,,give into the highjackers demands they said,,,nuke power is safe they say,,good grief,,,small bullet big bullet your still shot ,its in our food now ,,next stop inside of you well call it flavor yum
ms.sc. April 08, 2012 at 09:27 PM
Our greed for money and power is slowly killing our planet. And our Government cuts programs to educate our society. Discusting and sad. Let us learn from Japan's nightmare, as it is now becoming Everyones disaster, nightmare. SHUT DOWN SONGS NOW!
Rossmoor Resident April 08, 2012 at 11:06 PM
Correction: The Fukushima Daiichi reactors did NOT "blow apart". The reactors leaked and were damaged beyond repair, but they are still intact. The explosions seen on TV were caused by hydrogen buildup inside buildings housing auxilliary equipment, not the reactors themselves.
ms.sc. April 08, 2012 at 11:50 PM
Even so, ...what was the reasoning in building a nuclear plant on an ocean front, in the ring-of-fire?! Greed? Stupidity? Just like SONGS...what makes anyone so certain this can't and will not happen to the precious, infamous, untouchable Southern California Coast?? Don't want to sound like a "Debby Downer" here, but...
ms.sc. April 08, 2012 at 11:53 PM
P.S. LEAKING!!! Does that make you feel better?! You breathe, you eat? So does our planet. Nice.
Dave Patterson April 09, 2012 at 10:51 AM
Check out the unit 4 news. http://enenews.com/former-un-advisor-ive-been-told-maybe-50-years-to-contain-radiation-if-no-4-pool-collapses-during-50-years-continual-you-cannot-contain-video
ms.sc. April 09, 2012 at 03:17 PM
Thank you Dave for providing us this link.
Judith April 09, 2012 at 08:34 PM
What is not said or known..is this:should be continuously monitoring for CESIUM, not Iodine. Iodine is dangerous, but for a shorter time. CS will last alot longer and is therefore, a danger for a longer time. Is it any wonder they don't measure for it...Yes, this study is important and you should press your CA local, state and Federal reps to push for more and more continuous monitoring. Check out the FFAN site on facebook.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something