.
Feedback

NASA Eye Safety Suggestions For Viewing Partial Solar Eclipse

Partial eclipses, annular eclipses, and the partial phases of total eclipses are never safe to watch without taking special precautions, according to NASA. Follow these tips if you plan to view.

If you plan to catch a glimpse of Sunday's partial solar eclipse at about 5:25 p.m., in Southern California, you might want to heed these tips from NASA's Eclipse website.

Here's Sunday's eclipse schedule for Southern California:

  • 5:24 p.m.: Eclipse begins
  • 6:38 p.m.: Maximum eclipse
  • 7:42 p.m.: Eclipse ends
  • 7:52 p.m.: Sunset

Here is information from the NASA site:

"Partial eclipses, annular eclipses, and the partial phases of total eclipses are never safe to watch without taking special precautions. Even when 99 percent of the sun's surface is obscured during the partial phases of a total eclipse, the remaining photospheric crescent is intensely bright and cannot be viewed safely without eye protection. Do not attempt to observe the partial or annular phases of any eclipse with the naked eye. Failure to use appropriate filtration may result in permanent eye damage or blindness."

The site reports that the safest ways to see an eclipse is by projection, "in which a pinhole or small opening is used to cast the image of the sun on a screen placed a half-meter or more beyond the opening. Projected images of the sun may even be seen on the ground in the small openings created by interlacing fingers, or in the dappled sunlight beneath a leafy tree."

NASA also says binoculars may be used to project a magnified image of the sun on a white card, but you "must avoid the temptation of using these instruments for direct viewing."

The site also indicates that the sun can be viewed directly only when using filters specifically designed for this purpose. Such filters usually have a thin layer of aluminum, chromium or silver deposited on their surfaces that attenuates ultraviolet, visible, and infrared energy. "One of the most widely available filters for safe solar viewing is a number 14 welder's glass, available through welding supply outlets."

Another option it suggests is aluminized Mylar which can easily be cut with scissors and adapted to any kind of box or viewing device. "No filter is safe to use with any optical device (i.e. - telescope, binoculars, etc.) unless it has been specifically designed for that purpose."

Filters that you want to stay clear of and that NASA considers unsafe include: color film, some non-silver black and white film, medical x-ray films with images on them, smoked glass, photographic neutral density filters and polarizing filters, the site reports.

In addition, NASA warns not to experiment with other filters unless you are certain that they are safe. "Damage to the eyes comes predominantly from invisible infrared wavelengths."

Bottom-line the site reports: "Even if the sun appears dark in a filter or if you don't feel any discomfort, does not guarantee that your eyes are safe. Avoid all unnecessary risks." 

"In spite of these precautions, the total phase of an eclipse can and should be viewed without any filters whatsoever. The naked eye view of totality is completely safe and is overwhelmingly awe-inspiring," the site reports.

(Source: NASA Eclipse website)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Los Alamitos-Seal Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
BLUESGUITAR777 May 17, 2013 at 07:56 am
http://www.fbcla.com/victory That'll get ya there faster... ;o)
BG Stine May 10, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Did anyone notice that this story - "Prime Real Esate for Sale-$100.00 and up" -about aRead More library (below) was posted by someone name Storey? Just like the Torrance Library. It's Assistant Director is named Norm Reader.
JustUs February 27, 2013 at 08:16 pm
I think it's more important for journalists to ask vital questions at press conferences whenRead More politicians and other leaders are addressing the public on crucial matters. Whenever I see or listen to these public press conferences the journalists ask 'soft ball' questions almost all the time. Few ask really good 'hard ball' questions to get to the truth. Almost like the journalists protect those on the hot seat. So I would rather have this competition focus on the students developing questions to ask the one giving the press conference after they read a makeshift scenario of the events that produced the press conference. Just asking the students to watch a press conference and then write a report evaluates them on their stenographer skills. That's not really what it means to be a 'journalist'.
enea ostrich April 12, 2013 at 03:42 am
The mere fact that Nancy Shultz who is an investment officer at ProLogis got quoted in the SunRead More Newspaper (Ted Apodaca had write up) today stating that there are differences between a trucking terminal and a logistics facility. The only difference is WHAT? When you think of a distribution center that brings trucks in you realize it must come in TRUCKS of course, duh. She goes on to be quoted verbatim: “We are going to be consistent with what is already in the neighborhood,” she said. She continues with “There is information that says we are building a truck depot. A depot usually has only little office space an lots of extra land to park for staging.” WELL, I would like to inform her that a truck depot/terminal/Container Freight Station (CFS) is where trucks go to for unloading their consolidated containers. She CAN TRY and change the verbage and I am sure she will, but I ain’t buying it BABE because I work in this industry and I actually know the verbage, no matter how much you twist it. We have truckers coming into the L.A. and Long Beach harbor terminals right now with the word “logistics” in their name and we also know they ARE DROPPING off their containers to customers–YEP–and those customers ARE EVERYWHERE, WHICH INCLUDES HERE. ProLogis, shame on you for pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes. Its not nice to fool NATURE lovers!
enea ostrich April 12, 2013 at 03:38 am
Good point CDC on the Los Al Hospital aspect. I didn't write that up because it was the proximityRead More of the site, but now that you mention it--I will include that fact in my next write up. If you wanna read something quite interesting, read up on what they are doing in Carson--- http://ir.prologis.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=658348 Also, the posting today for jobs on www.career-found.com says ProLogis wants people to apply today for Cypress jobs and is hiring right now. Oh really???
CDC April 12, 2013 at 02:21 am
Great write-up on the Mitt Romney style property investment company. They have ZERO regard for theRead More people who would be living around this volcano of diesel fumes. You are also 100% percent correct about the roads that will get destroyed due to wear. Tax payers are going to be PAYING EXTRA to have the roads surfaced three times as much while they get to breath the diesel particulate. Nice exchange! Also, you forgot to state that there is a MAJOR hospital four blocks away that needs clear access on roads coming in from Rossmoor and Los Alamitos. HUGE Trucks backed up on our already packed arterial roads are not going to help emergency ambulance calls get to the hospital any faster. I'm sure all the people going to the hospital for cystic fibrosis, emphysema, bronchitis, asthma, COPD, Lung Cancer will love breathing that dirty air. And how many car spaces does a double trailer rig take on the road? 3-4? Our community is going to have China style air quality! Remember that the AQMD nazis want to now prohibit fires in fireplaces thanks to the harbor pollution killing our air quality. Having this site would only make the air worse and push the pollution numbers over the top. PLEASE print the above article out and hand it out and post it for as many people as possible to read.
Cuong Nguyen April 10, 2013 at 02:34 am
I can has new owners adopt me?
Kathleen Kilmarx April 8, 2013 at 08:09 pm
You lookin at me????
Diane Sosa April 8, 2013 at 07:16 pm
Whad-you looking at? Go ahead and pick me up! I dare you! I might just turn out to be your nextRead More lap blanket!
Dr. Zillman March 27, 2013 at 10:38 am
The increase is lower than the rate of inflation. Understood, but most of the people in the districtRead More are experiencing stagnant income, if not reductions. This is why residents are unhappy when recurring costs increase. Tough situation.
Mama Deerest March 24, 2013 at 04:28 pm
Looking for a place that will buy a large amount of gently used (some new with tags and never worn)Read More clothes from private party. Anyone know of a person/ place?